excerpt from: http://www.geocities.com/northstarzone/CUPPETT.html

Cuppett says his contacts have obtained copies of three hit lists
being maintained by U.S. Intelligence. The lists are color-coded as
red, blue and green. These lists contain the names of people who
might be rounded up when the time is right. He says there are 6.2
million Americans on the blue list alone. He noted that many
upstanding citizens have been shocked to find their names on those
lists. And now, with Iraq, and terrorist attacks being used as an
excuse to propell us into a full blown martial law/state of emergency
status, it looks like this might be that season when they begin to
TAKE OUT PEOPLE LIKE Al Cuppett! And we have been told THEY WILL TAKE
OUT ENTIRE FAMILIES so that no one will be left behind to talk. They
have made numerous attempts to break into his home. But thanks to Al
Cuppett's eyeopening message, concerned citizens of America now have
a clearer understanding of:

1. Why our national military apparatus is gradually being dismantled
and our defensive bases closed.

2. Why our troops and National Guard forces are continually being
shipped abroad and kept involved in foreign quagmires.

3. Why U.S. troops now serve under foreign commanders and wear the
insignia of the United Nations.

4. Why heavily fortified FEMA bases with underground control centers
are being built and upgraded at a feverish pace all over the country.

5. Why America is filling up with foreign troops and military
equipment.

6. Why the Communist Chinese government is working to obtain control
of a former military installations.

7. Why special special forces working with FEMA are continually
conducting urban assault exercises in towns and cities across the
nation, signalling a future crackdown on civilian populations.

8. Why, under numerous pretexts, a massive campaign is underway to
disarm American civilians.

9. How the phony war on drugs is being used to build penal facilities
that may be used as future detainment centers.

10. Why the media keeps harping on the dangers of terrorist attacks
so as to enlist popular support for authoritarian executive orders
and emergency actions.

Subject: UN [black ops] cremation trucks/platoons now operating in
Western US
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:54:24 -0400

Al Cuppett

US Army & Action Officer, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (Retired)
366 Graves Mill Rd
Madison, VA 22727

20 June 2006

Subject: Intel report - (All Sources) UN “black operations” cremation
trucks/platoons now operating in Western US.

Source Reliability: Very High (report forwarded via “Q-Files”)

This report has been promulgated from “all sources”; however, the main
source is a high ranking US military officer.

Within the last three days a US Special Operations Unit, possibly
operating **autonomously from J-3, the Joint Staff, and obviously
separate from the Dept of Defense, Homeland Security, the NSC, and the
White House, were reported trying to interdict two separate convoys of
UN “Smokey” semi-trailers (18 wheelers); as they are now called.

Professional deduction, and “intelligence indicators” over the past
few months, in the absence of full particulars, reveals that the
Special Ops unit became involved when it was learned that two convoys
of UN trucks were proceeding from AO-Echo (Area of Operations Echo) in
New Mexico, and another from AO-D which is Montana. The trucks were
hauling detained personnel, and due to being discovered, were rapidly
proceeding to Canada. The original mission was to stop the “Smokeys”,
not letting them reach the border, thus rescuing and then “debriefing”
the detainees, who were known to be alive. Source further states this
indicates that Red List pickups have begun prior to actual martial law
declaration.

The convoy from AO-E contained 18 trucks, whereas the convoy in AO-D
had four trucks. One of the trucks was interdicted by US forces; with
the crew being “neutralized”. However, the detainees were all found
dead. However, apparently the support column for that Smokey arrived
and US forces withdrew due to superior UN forces; which projected, in
“Pentagonese” an unacceptable attrition rate of US personnel.

Be advised, the UN support units include about 5 or 6 white vans or
SUVs, with approximately 30 fully armed personnel aboard. One van can
be assumed to be a “Special Weapons Squad”. The Smokeys will have at
least 3 people in the front seat, and the support vehicles will be
loaded with black uniformed, armed personnel.

Source advised that all precautions must be taken if Smokey trucks are
engaged, as support vans, if not present, will follow very shortly.
Furthermore, the Smokeys can cremate their “human cargo” in record
time. This report confirms the report last week of “cremation
trailers” within the CONUS.

The first engagement revealed there were armed French troops, along
with armed German and Chinese Intelligence agents. Source reported
that the foreign personnel were equipped with thermal imaging,
Infra-red, and night vision equipment. This means the Red List pickups
are being done at night; presumably on targets that are known to be
“passive”.

Source states that Red Lists (for immediate extermination) are being
“revised”, that is, more names are being added to the “useless eater”
category, since it is felt that many who were considered to be
“re-educatable” must now be added to the Red or Blue Lists.

The location of the shootout was not specified, but had to have been
on a line from NM to the Canadian Border.

Be advised the recent shooting in a Capitol parking garage was
apparently a clash of various agents vying for preeminence. Capitol
police were pulled from the scene. We have “arrived” folks! You’ll
recall an earlier report stated that foreign forces were staging in
the DC area, with operations being planned before the end of August.
---- Forewarned is forearmed. Make Aliyah now. At least the cremation
trucks haven’t begun in Israel.

Warm regards,
Al Cuppett

Bronze Star and Purple Heart Medals, et al, Vietnam, 1970-1971 (15
months) Secretary of Defense Civilian Service Medal, the Joint Staff,
1990 (6 years) Joint Meritorious Unit Award, the Joint Staff, 1984-1990

**The unit would have to be operating autonomously because Bush,
Cheney, or Rumsfeld, Chertoff, or a “shadow government” operative,
would have ordered the Special Ops force arrested/detained, if at all
possible. The “civil war” as seen by the prophets of God, has
apparently started. However, be advised there have been many
“engagements” with UN units already!
____________________________________________________

[FIRST REPORT]

1346 hrs (1:46 PM)
20 June 2006

Subject: Preliminary Intel Report – UN CREMATION TRUCKS/PLATOONS
OPERATING

To: Bill

Info to selected Believers/Observants. This is a preliminary report.
Source reliability: HIGHEST

Drafting final follow-up within the hour.

UN Cremation trucks operating in NM and MT. Hit teams in platoon size,
with vans and SUVs supporting 18 wheelers called “Smokey’s”, Guess
why.? Human smoke is black!!! I watched the funeral home down the
road. Auschwitz also had charcoal black smoke billowing out of it’s
chimneys almost 24 hours a day. The 4th Reich is now here..

Long story. be alert. They have foreign troops and night ops
equipment. Deduction: Red List pickup operations are NOW being run
---- at night. This and much more from high ranking active duty Flag
Officer to follow.

Comment: Be in prayer and/or be ready --- at night.

More later
Al Cuppett

“This Is The Ark”—Noah’s Ark
Expedition Team Member -
Bill Wilson

By Bill Wilson, KIN Senior Analyst

WASH—Jun 19—KIN—The expedition team led by Christian explorer Bob Cornuke found Noah’s Ark, according to team member Arch Bonnema, who said five of the nine samples taken from the vessel were confirmed as petrified wood, some of which had sea fossils contained within at 13,100 feet in the Ararat mountain range in Northern Iran.

“Yes, I definitely believe that this is the ark,” Bonnema told KIN. “When you are there in person, you see that the wood is hand hewn, its obviously a man-made structure.” Bonnema said that standing on the Ark left no doubt in his mind because the floors, the walls and other pieces were all man made and were so huge that nobody could have carried the timber to 13,100 feet and find the materials to build such a structure. He said that the Ark is in an avalanche and has been covered up by ice and snow for a long time. It was not until last year when record high temperatures melted the snow and ice revealing the Ark, Bonnema said.

Bonnema believes that what he saw was the Ark because of its size, which is exactly the footprint of what was described in the Bible, the large sections of petrified wood, and that it matches up with the verses in Genesis describing the Ark and its location. He said that while there were over 1,000 expeditions to Mount Ararat in Turkey, he believes the true Ark is where he explored in Iran. He said that the Mount Ararat in Turkey was named in the 13th century by Marco Polo and had little or nothing to do with the Mount Ararat mountain range.

“Do we have absolute 100% proof? No. But we have extraordinary evidence,” Bonnema said, but it is his personal opinion that the expedition team’s finding is Noah’s Ark. “I want to tell the story to as many people as I can,” he said. Bonnema said that the more people see and hear what he has experienced, he believes the more people who will believe the Bible is true. “I believe that is the whole reason why God allowed us to find it,” he said. Bonnema is available for speaking at your group or church and he can be reached at arch@joshuafinanacial.com. Pictures and more information can be found here where a copyrighted article and pictures of the expedition are located.

Since the initial story ran on KIN, there have been many comments about the Ark. Some claim it was found in other places. Others claim that they have satellite images of the Ark at another location. There is much debate over this archeological mystery. From my point of view as a journalist, whether Bob Cornuke found the Ark or whether it was found by someone else some other time is immaterial. Why? Because I believe that the Bible is the infallable and inerrant Word of God and that these pieces of evidence are for those who don’t believe. However, if the alleged findings are proven correct that would be very exciting and would be additional proof of the Bible's veracity, but we must be careful to make sure that we worship the Creator, not the creation or the findings of evidence that substantiate what God has already said He did. I found that many were vehement in their defense of who discovered the Ark and/or if it was discovered, etc. It would be nice if us Christians would be as equally enthusiastic about answering the call of the great commission in Mark 16:15 where Jesus said, “Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.”

Worm wriggles through Yahoo mail flaw
By Dawn Kawamoto
Staff Writer, CNET News.com

Published: June 12, 2006, 1:32 PM PDT
Last modified: June 12, 2006, 5:55 PM PDT
TalkBack E-mail Print
update A new worm that targets Yahoo e-mail users is on the loose, taking advantage of an _JavaScript flaw, a security company has warned.
The Yamanner worm targets all versions of Yahoo Web-based mail except the latest beta version, Symantec said in an advisory released Monday.
At the time of the advisory, there was no patch for the vulnerability. But by later on Monday, Yahoo said it had come up with a fix for the flaw, which it said had affected very few of its customers.
"We have taken steps to resolve the issue and protect our users from further attacks of this worm. The solution has been automatically distributed to all Yahoo Mail customers, and requires no additional action on the part of the user," a Yahoo representative said.
Both Yahoo and Symantec are encouraging people to update the antivirus definitions on their PCs.
Yamanner arrives in a Yahoo mailbox bearing the subject header "New Graphic Site." Once the message is opened, the computer becomes infected and the worm spreads itself to people on the Yahoo e-mail contact list. The harvested e-mail addresses are also sent to a remote online server, which Symantec suspects may use the information for spam campaigns.
"The worm is taking a pretty novel approach," said Dean Turner, senior manager of Symantec Security Response. "It takes advantage of a _JavaScript vulnerability, so the user doesn't even have to click on an attachment to get infected."
Yamanner exploits the Yahoo flaw by enabling the scripts that are embedded in HTML e-mails to be run by the user's Web browser.
The worm, which was spotted in the wild early this morning, has hit the remote server more than 100,000 times, forwarding Yahoo e-mail addresses harvested from unsuspecting users, Turner said.
In other news:
Microsoft gets down to business
Blogs, vlogs and the new mainstream
Net neutrality's D.C. travails
News.com Extra: Start-ups let customers run the show
Video: Techdirt Greenhouse features demo from video-remix site
Although the worm is spreading quickly, and no patch has been issued, Symantec is rating the threat a "2." The security vendor uses a 1-to-5 rating system, with "5" as its most severe category.
"Antivirus definitions have been released for it, and Yahoo is working on a patch, so we don't want to cry wolf," Turner said. "Although there is the potential the worm will affect a larger number of people, for now to raise it to another (higher) level would be inappropriate."
He added it is premature to predict whether this worm will morph into other forms and attack other browser-based forms of e-mail, such as Google's Gmail.
Systems affected include Windows 2000, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows Me, Windows NT, Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP, according to Symantec's advisory.

AT&T rewrites rules: Your data isn't yours
- David Lazarus
Wednesday, June 21, 2006

AT&T has issued an updated privacy policy that takes effect Friday. The changes are significant because they appear to give the telecom giant more latitude when it comes to sharing customers' personal data with government officials.

The new policy says that AT&T -- not customers -- owns customers' confidential info and can use it "to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process."

The policy also indicates that AT&T will track the viewing habits of customers of its new video service -- something that cable and satellite providers are prohibited from doing.

Moreover, AT&T (formerly known as SBC) is requiring customers to agree to its updated privacy policy as a condition for service -- a new move that legal experts say will reduce customers' recourse for any future data sharing with government authorities or others.

The company's policy overhaul follows recent reports that AT&T was one of several leading telecom providers that allowed the National Security Agency warrantless access to its voice and data networks as part of the Bush administration's war on terror.

"They're obviously trying to avoid a hornet's nest of consumer-protection lawsuits," said Chris Hoofnagle, a San Francisco privacy consultant and former senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

"They've written this new policy so broadly that they've given themselves maximum flexibility when it comes to disclosing customers' records," he said.

AT&T is being sued by San Francisco's Electronic Frontier Foundation for allegedly allowing the NSA to tap into the company's data network, providing warrantless access to customers' e-mails and Web browsing.

AT&T is also believed to have participated in President Bush's acknowledged domestic spying program, in which the NSA was given warrantless access to U.S. citizens' phone calls.

AT&T said in a statement last month that it "has a long history of vigorously protecting customer privacy" and that "our customers expect, deserve and receive nothing less than our fullest commitment to their privacy."

But the company also asserted that it has "an obligation to assist law enforcement and other government agencies responsible for protecting the public welfare, whether it be an individual or the security interests of the entire nation."

Under its former privacy policy, introduced in September 2004, AT&T said it might use customer's data "to respond to subpoenas, court orders or other legal process, to the extent required and/or permitted by law."

The new version, which is specifically for Internet and video customers, is much more explicit about the company's right to cooperate with government agencies in any security-related matters -- and AT&T's belief that customers' data belongs to the company, not customers.

"While your account information may be personal to you, these records constitute business records that are owned by AT&T," the new policy declares. "As such, AT&T may disclose such records to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process."

It says the company "may disclose your information in response to subpoenas, court orders, or other legal process," omitting the earlier language about such processes being "required and/or permitted by law."

The new policy states that AT&T "may also use your information in order to investigate, prevent or take action regarding illegal activities, suspected fraud (or) situations involving potential threats to the physical safety of any person" -- conditions that would appear to embrace any terror-related [and who is to define the loosely stated “terror” qualification?] circumstance.

Ray Everett-Church, a Silicon Valley privacy consultant, said it seems clear that AT&T has substantially modified its privacy policy in light of revelations about the government's domestic spying program.

"It's obvious that they are trying to stretch their blanket pretty tightly to cover as many exposed bits as possible," he said.

Gail Hillebrand, a staff attorney at Consumers Union in San Francisco, said the declaration that AT&T owns customers' data represents the most significant departure from the company's previous policy.

"It creates the impression that they can do whatever they want," she said. "This is the real heart of AT&T's new policy and is a pretty fundamental difference from how most customers probably see things."

John Britton, an AT&T spokesman, denied that the updated privacy policy marks a shift in the company's approach to customers' info.

"We don't see this as anything new," he said. "Our goal was to make the policy easier to read and easier for customers to understand." [Bull!]

He acknowledged that there was no explicit requirement in the past that customers accept the privacy policy as a condition for service. And he acknowledged that the 2004 policy said nothing about customers' data being owned by AT&T.

But Britton insisted that these elements essentially could be found between the lines of the former policy.

"There were many things that were implied in the last policy." He said. "We're just clarifying the last policy."

AT&T's new privacy policy is the first to include the company's video service. AT&T says it's spending $4.6 billion to roll out TV programming to 19 million homes nationwide.

The policy refers to two AT&T video services -- Homezone and U-verse. Homezone is AT&T's satellite TV service, offered in conjunction with Dish Network, and U-verse is the new cablelike video service delivered over phone lines.

In a section on "usage information," the privacy policy says AT&T will collect "information about viewing, game, recording and other navigation choices that you and those in your household make when using Homezone or AT&T U-verse TV Services."

The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 stipulates that cable and satellite companies can't collect or disclose information about customers' viewing habits.

The law is silent on video services offered by phone companies via the Internet, basically because legislators never anticipated such technology would be available.

AT&T's Britton said the 1984 law doesn't apply to his company's video service because AT&T isn't a cable provider. "We are not building a cable TV network," he said. "We're building an Internet protocol television network."

But Andrew Johnson, a spokesman for cable heavyweight Comcast, disputed this perspective.

"Video is video is video," he said. "If you're delivering programming over a telecommunications network to a TV set, all rules need to be the same."

AT&T's new and former privacy policies both state that "conducting business ethically and ensuring privacy is critical to maintaining the public's trust and achieving success in a dynamic and competitive business climate."

Both also state that "privacy responsibility" extends "to the privacy of conversations and to the flow of information in data form." As such, both say that "the trust of our customers necessitates vigilant, responsible privacy protections."

The 2004 policy, though, went one step further. It said AT&T realizes "that privacy is an important issue for our customers and members."

The new policy makes no such acknowledgment.